Football— we've all heard of it, we've all seen it. No matter where you're from, there's likely a football team representing your nation. Football's universal appeal is evident, with 211 national associations affiliated with FIFA, spanning six continents.

This global reach culminates in the FIFA World Cup, a tournament that not only showcases top-tier athletic talent but also serves as a significant economic force, generating billions of dollars worldwide. The organization of FIFA, along with its partners, makes vast sums of dollars with its television rights, sponsorships, and ticket sales; yet, the nature of the financial impact for host nations is far more complicated. This article aims to educate about the latest developments of this gigantic profit-making spectacle of football and what lies in store for curious audiences.

Image Credit: Ank Kumar from Wikimedia Commons

FIFA’s Business Model: A Revenue Powerhouse

FIFA, the governing body of international football, profits through several channels such as:

• Television Rights: Accounting for over 55% of FIFA’s revenue, the media aspect of the game includes broadcasting deals with major networks to ensure that millions worldwide can watch the tournament.
• Marketing and Sponsorships: The World Cup would not be possible without support from global brands like Adidas, Coca-Cola, and Visa, who pay top dollar for official partnerships and airtime.
• Ticket Sales and Hospitality Rights: FIFA, through its subsidiaries, retains full control over match day revenue. Through its multiple games, the international business has amassed millions of spectators.
• Licensing Agreements: FIFA has created a brand for itself past the World Cup. Expanding to sectors such as video games, merchandise, and other branding deals, further contributing significantly to FIFA’s income.

In 2018, FIFA generated approximately $4.6 billion, with over $2.5 billion coming from television rights alone. Although the organization allegedly operates as a nonprofit, its financial practices often raise questions about transparency and wealth distribution.

Image Credit: IQRemix from Wikimedia Commons

Take the Quiz: Which Squid Game Player Are You?

Ever wondered which player you’d be if you found yourself in the Squid Game universe? Take this quiz to find out which character matches your perso...

The Cost of Hosting: A Complex Dilemma

Hosting the World Cup is a significant financial gamble for the hosting countries. Although the internationally known game does promise incredible benefits such as increased tourism, job creation, and international recognition, the upfront investment is staggering. Several positive and negative aspects of the event are present. needed to be considered as countries spend billions on stadium construction, infrastructure upgrades, and event organization.

An acute example of this is the recent 2022 World Cup based in Qatar which cost an estimated $220 billion, making it the most expensive tournament in history. Despite the large amount generated, only a fraction of the money itself contributes to the country's economy. Additionally, the Qatar government and hosting committee faced significant backlash from media outlets, sporting fanatics, and human rights groups.

There were a plethora of concerns that were raised over the country’s human rights record, its limited football history, the extreme cost of the event, the local climate challenges, and allegations of bribery in the bidding process. These factors highlight the controversial and often high-risk nature of hosting a global sporting event of this scale.

Image Credit: Gisele Teresinha from Wikimedia Commons

Who Actually Profits?

• FIFA: The biggest breadwinner, FIFA maintains control over most revenue streams. The organization ensures that all profits from television rights, sponsorships, and ticketing go back into its accounts.
• Sponsors and Broadcasters: The tournament provides a unique platform for global brands to enhance visibility, while networks secure advertising revenue.
• Hospitality and Tourism Industries: Due to the increased tourism, hotels, airlines, and local businesses experience a temporary economic boost during the tournament.
• Local Governments: Some host cities benefit from improved infrastructure and long-term tourism growth, though this varies case by case for each country.

Image Credit: ijs from Wikimedia Commons

Long-Term Impact: Boom or Bust?

Some hosts, like Germany (2006), experienced long-term economic growth due to improved tourism and infrastructure. The tournament provided many benefits to Germany, helping to solidify the country as a popular travel destination and enhanced its reputation as a well-organized and efficient host for international events. Investments in transportation and stadium renovations continued to benefit the country long after the final whistle.

Contrastingly, South Africa (2010) saw minimal long-term benefits despite heavy spending. While the event generated a temporary boost in tourism and national pride, South Africa invested millions into the infrastructure of expensive stadiums, many of which became underutilized or abandoned as well as failing to provide sustained economic returns. The projected influx of tourists and business investments did not fully materialize, leaving the country with significant debts and infrastructure that struggled to find practical use.

Overall, the FIFA World Cup generates billions, but the profits are not evenly or fairly distributed. FIFA emerges as the biggest financial winner, while host nations face high costs with uncertain returns. Whether the tournament is an economic success or a financial burden depends on a country's ability to leverage the event beyond the final whistle. As FIFA continues to expand globally in 2026 and 2027, the financial stakes will only grow -- making it more crucial than ever to ask: who really wins?